1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
| //===--- ParseInit.cpp - Initializer Parsing ------------------------------===//
//
// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions.
// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
//
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
//
// This file implements initializer parsing as specified by C99 6.7.8.
//
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
#include "clang/Parse/ParseDiagnostic.h"
#include "clang/Parse/Parser.h"
#include "clang/Parse/RAIIObjectsForParser.h"
#include "clang/Sema/Designator.h"
#include "clang/Sema/Scope.h"
#include "llvm/ADT/SmallString.h"
using namespace clang;
/// MayBeDesignationStart - Return true if the current token might be the start
/// of a designator. If we can tell it is impossible that it is a designator,
/// return false.
bool Parser::MayBeDesignationStart() {
switch (Tok.getKind()) {
default:
return false;
case tok::period: // designator: '.' identifier
return true;
case tok::l_square: { // designator: array-designator
if (!PP.getLangOpts().CPlusPlus11)
return true;
// C++11 lambda expressions and C99 designators can be ambiguous all the
// way through the closing ']' and to the next character. Handle the easy
// cases here, and fall back to tentative parsing if those fail.
switch (PP.LookAhead(0).getKind()) {
case tok::equal:
case tok::ellipsis:
case tok::r_square:
// Definitely starts a lambda expression.
return false;
case tok::amp:
case tok::kw_this:
case tok::star:
case tok::identifier:
// We have to do additional analysis, because these could be the
// start of a constant expression or a lambda capture list.
break;
default:
// Anything not mentioned above cannot occur following a '[' in a
// lambda expression.
return true;
}
// Handle the complicated case below.
break;
}
case tok::identifier: // designation: identifier ':'
return PP.LookAhead(0).is(tok::colon);
}
// Parse up to (at most) the token after the closing ']' to determine
// whether this is a C99 designator or a lambda.
RevertingTentativeParsingAction Tentative(*this);
LambdaIntroducer Intro;
LambdaIntroducerTentativeParse ParseResult;
if (ParseLambdaIntroducer(Intro, &ParseResult)) {
// Hit and diagnosed an error in a lambda.
// FIXME: Tell the caller this happened so they can recover.
return true;
}
switch (ParseResult) {
case LambdaIntroducerTentativeParse::Success:
case LambdaIntroducerTentativeParse::Incomplete:
// Might be a lambda-expression. Keep looking.
// FIXME: If our tentative parse was not incomplete, parse the lambda from
// here rather than throwing away then reparsing the LambdaIntroducer.
break;
case LambdaIntroducerTentativeParse::MessageSend:
case LambdaIntroducerTentativeParse::Invalid:
// Can't be a lambda-expression. Treat it as a designator.
// FIXME: Should we disambiguate against a message-send?
return true;
}
// Once we hit the closing square bracket, we look at the next
// token. If it's an '=', this is a designator. Otherwise, it's a
// lambda expression. This decision favors lambdas over the older
// GNU designator syntax, which allows one to omit the '=', but is
// consistent with GCC.
return Tok.is(tok::equal);
}
static void CheckArrayDesignatorSyntax(Parser &P, SourceLocation Loc,
Designation &Desig) {
// If we have exactly one array designator, this used the GNU
// 'designation: array-designator' extension, otherwise there should be no
// designators at all!
if (Desig.getNumDesignators() == 1 &&
(Desig.getDesignator(0).isArrayDesignator() ||
Desig.getDesignator(0).isArrayRangeDesignator()))
P.Diag(Loc, diag::ext_gnu_missing_equal_designator);
else if (Desig.getNumDesignators() > 0)
P.Diag(Loc, diag::err_expected_equal_designator);
}
/// ParseInitializerWithPotentialDesignator - Parse the 'initializer' production
/// checking to see if the token stream starts with a designator.
///
/// C99:
///
/// designation:
/// designator-list '='
/// [GNU] array-designator
/// [GNU] identifier ':'
///
/// designator-list:
/// designator
/// designator-list designator
///
/// designator:
/// array-designator
/// '.' identifier
///
/// array-designator:
/// '[' constant-expression ']'
/// [GNU] '[' constant-expression '...' constant-expression ']'
///
/// C++20:
///
/// designated-initializer-list:
/// designated-initializer-clause
/// designated-initializer-list ',' designated-initializer-clause
///
/// designated-initializer-clause:
/// designator brace-or-equal-initializer
///
/// designator:
/// '.' identifier
///
/// We allow the C99 syntax extensions in C++20, but do not allow the C++20
/// extension (a braced-init-list after the designator with no '=') in C99.
///
/// NOTE: [OBC] allows '[ objc-receiver objc-message-args ]' as an
/// initializer (because it is an expression). We need to consider this case
/// when parsing array designators.
///
ExprResult Parser::ParseInitializerWithPotentialDesignator() {
// If this is the old-style GNU extension:
// designation ::= identifier ':'
// Handle it as a field designator. Otherwise, this must be the start of a
// normal expression.
if (Tok.is(tok::identifier)) {
const IdentifierInfo *FieldName = Tok.getIdentifierInfo();
SmallString<256> NewSyntax;
llvm::raw_svector_ostream(NewSyntax) << '.' << FieldName->getName()
<< " = ";
SourceLocation NameLoc = ConsumeToken(); // Eat the identifier.
assert(Tok.is(tok::colon) && "MayBeDesignationStart not working properly!");
SourceLocation ColonLoc = ConsumeToken();
Diag(NameLoc, diag::ext_gnu_old_style_field_designator)
<< FixItHint::CreateReplacement(SourceRange(NameLoc, ColonLoc),
NewSyntax);
Designation D;
D.AddDesignator(Designator::getField(FieldName, SourceLocation(), NameLoc));
return Actions.ActOnDesignatedInitializer(D, ColonLoc, true,
ParseInitializer());
}
// Desig - This is initialized when we see our first designator. We may have
// an objc message send with no designator, so we don't want to create this
// eagerly.
Designation Desig;
// Parse each designator in the designator list until we find an initializer.
while (Tok.is(tok::period) || Tok.is(tok::l_square)) {
if (Tok.is(tok::period)) {
// designator: '.' identifier
SourceLocation DotLoc = ConsumeToken();
if (Tok.isNot(tok::identifier)) {
Diag(Tok.getLocation(), diag::err_expected_field_designator);
return ExprError();
}
Desig.AddDesignator(Designator::getField(Tok.getIdentifierInfo(), DotLoc,
Tok.getLocation()));
ConsumeToken(); // Eat the identifier.
continue;
}
// We must have either an array designator now or an objc message send.
assert(Tok.is(tok::l_square) && "Unexpected token!");
// Handle the two forms of array designator:
// array-designator: '[' constant-expression ']'
// array-designator: '[' constant-expression '...' constant-expression ']'
//
// Also, we have to handle the case where the expression after the
// designator an an objc message send: '[' objc-message-expr ']'.
// Interesting cases are:
// [foo bar] -> objc message send
// [foo] -> array designator
// [foo ... bar] -> array designator
// [4][foo bar] -> obsolete GNU designation with objc message send.
//
// We do not need to check for an expression starting with [[ here. If it
// contains an Objective-C message send, then it is not an ill-formed
// attribute. If it is a lambda-expression within an array-designator, then
// it will be rejected because a constant-expression cannot begin with a
// lambda-expression.
InMessageExpressionRAIIObject InMessage(*this, true);
BalancedDelimiterTracker T(*this, tok::l_square);
T.consumeOpen();
SourceLocation StartLoc = T.getOpenLocation();
ExprResult Idx;
// If Objective-C is enabled and this is a typename (class message
// send) or send to 'super', parse this as a message send
// expression. We handle C++ and C separately, since C++ requires
// much more complicated parsing.
if (getLangOpts().ObjC && getLangOpts().CPlusPlus) {
// Send to 'super'.
if (Tok.is(tok::identifier) && Tok.getIdentifierInfo() == Ident_super &&
NextToken().isNot(tok::period) &&
getCurScope()->isInObjcMethodScope()) {
CheckArrayDesignatorSyntax(*this, StartLoc, Desig);
return ParseAssignmentExprWithObjCMessageExprStart(
StartLoc, ConsumeToken(), nullptr, nullptr);
}
// Parse the receiver, which is either a type or an expression.
bool IsExpr;
void *TypeOrExpr;
if (ParseObjCXXMessageReceiver(IsExpr, TypeOrExpr)) {
SkipUntil(tok::r_square, StopAtSemi);
return ExprError();
}
// If the receiver was a type, we have a class message; parse
// the rest of it.
if (!IsExpr) {
CheckArrayDesignatorSyntax(*this, StartLoc, Desig);
return ParseAssignmentExprWithObjCMessageExprStart(StartLoc,
SourceLocation(),
ParsedType::getFromOpaquePtr(TypeOrExpr),
nullptr);
}
// If the receiver was an expression, we still don't know
// whether we have a message send or an array designator; just
// adopt the expression for further analysis below.
// FIXME: potentially-potentially evaluated expression above?
Idx = ExprResult(static_cast<Expr*>(TypeOrExpr));
} else if (getLangOpts().ObjC && Tok.is(tok::identifier)) {
IdentifierInfo *II = Tok.getIdentifierInfo();
SourceLocation IILoc = Tok.getLocation();
ParsedType ReceiverType;
// Three cases. This is a message send to a type: [type foo]
// This is a message send to super: [super foo]
// This is a message sent to an expr: [super.bar foo]
switch (Actions.getObjCMessageKind(
getCurScope(), II, IILoc, II == Ident_super,
NextToken().is(tok::period), ReceiverType)) {
case Sema::ObjCSuperMessage:
CheckArrayDesignatorSyntax(*this, StartLoc, Desig);
return ParseAssignmentExprWithObjCMessageExprStart(
StartLoc, ConsumeToken(), nullptr, nullptr);
case Sema::ObjCClassMessage:
CheckArrayDesignatorSyntax(*this, StartLoc, Desig);
ConsumeToken(); // the identifier
if (!ReceiverType) {
SkipUntil(tok::r_square, StopAtSemi);
return ExprError();
}
// Parse type arguments and protocol qualifiers.
if (Tok.is(tok::less)) {
SourceLocation NewEndLoc;
TypeResult NewReceiverType
= parseObjCTypeArgsAndProtocolQualifiers(IILoc, ReceiverType,
/*consumeLastToken=*/true,
NewEndLoc);
if (!NewReceiverType.isUsable()) {
SkipUntil(tok::r_square, StopAtSemi);
return ExprError();
}
ReceiverType = NewReceiverType.get();
}
return ParseAssignmentExprWithObjCMessageExprStart(StartLoc,
SourceLocation(),
ReceiverType,
nullptr);
case Sema::ObjCInstanceMessage:
// Fall through; we'll just parse the expression and
// (possibly) treat this like an Objective-C message send
// later.
break;
}
}
// Parse the index expression, if we haven't already gotten one
// above (which can only happen in Objective-C++).
// Note that we parse this as an assignment expression, not a constant
// expression (allowing *=, =, etc) to handle the objc case. Sema needs
// to validate that the expression is a constant.
// FIXME: We also need to tell Sema that we're in a
// potentially-potentially evaluated context.
if (!Idx.get()) {
Idx = ParseAssignmentExpression();
if (Idx.isInvalid()) {
SkipUntil(tok::r_square, StopAtSemi);
return Idx;
}
}
// Given an expression, we could either have a designator (if the next
// tokens are '...' or ']' or an objc message send. If this is an objc
// message send, handle it now. An objc-message send is the start of
// an assignment-expression production.
if (getLangOpts().ObjC && Tok.isNot(tok::ellipsis) &&
Tok.isNot(tok::r_square)) {
CheckArrayDesignatorSyntax(*this, Tok.getLocation(), Desig);
return ParseAssignmentExprWithObjCMessageExprStart(
StartLoc, SourceLocation(), nullptr, Idx.get());
}
// If this is a normal array designator, remember it.
if (Tok.isNot(tok::ellipsis)) {
Desig.AddDesignator(Designator::getArray(Idx.get(), StartLoc));
} else {
// Handle the gnu array range extension.
Diag(Tok, diag::ext_gnu_array_range);
SourceLocation EllipsisLoc = ConsumeToken();
ExprResult RHS(ParseConstantExpression());
if (RHS.isInvalid()) {
SkipUntil(tok::r_square, StopAtSemi);
return RHS;
}
Desig.AddDesignator(Designator::getArrayRange(Idx.get(),
RHS.get(),
StartLoc, EllipsisLoc));
}
T.consumeClose();
Desig.getDesignator(Desig.getNumDesignators() - 1).setRBracketLoc(
T.getCloseLocation());
}
// Okay, we're done with the designator sequence. We know that there must be
// at least one designator, because the only case we can get into this method
// without a designator is when we have an objc message send. That case is
// handled and returned from above.
assert(!Desig.empty() && "Designator is empty?");
// Handle a normal designator sequence end, which is an equal.
if (Tok.is(tok::equal)) {
SourceLocation EqualLoc = ConsumeToken();
return Actions.ActOnDesignatedInitializer(Desig, EqualLoc, false,
ParseInitializer());
}
// Handle a C++20 braced designated initialization, which results in
// direct-list-initialization of the aggregate element. We allow this as an
// extension from C++11 onwards (when direct-list-initialization was added).
if (Tok.is(tok::l_brace) && getLangOpts().CPlusPlus11) {
return Actions.ActOnDesignatedInitializer(Desig, SourceLocation(), false,
ParseBraceInitializer());
}
// We read some number of designators and found something that isn't an = or
// an initializer. If we have exactly one array designator, this
// is the GNU 'designation: array-designator' extension. Otherwise, it is a
// parse error.
if (Desig.getNumDesignators() == 1 &&
(Desig.getDesignator(0).isArrayDesignator() ||
Desig.getDesignator(0).isArrayRangeDesignator())) {
Diag(Tok, diag::ext_gnu_missing_equal_designator)
<< FixItHint::CreateInsertion(Tok.getLocation(), "= ");
return Actions.ActOnDesignatedInitializer(Desig, Tok.getLocation(),
true, ParseInitializer());
}
Diag(Tok, diag::err_expected_equal_designator);
return ExprError();
}
/// ParseBraceInitializer - Called when parsing an initializer that has a
/// leading open brace.
///
/// initializer: [C99 6.7.8]
/// '{' initializer-list '}'
/// '{' initializer-list ',' '}'
/// [GNU] '{' '}'
///
/// initializer-list:
/// designation[opt] initializer ...[opt]
/// initializer-list ',' designation[opt] initializer ...[opt]
///
ExprResult Parser::ParseBraceInitializer() {
InMessageExpressionRAIIObject InMessage(*this, false);
BalancedDelimiterTracker T(*this, tok::l_brace);
T.consumeOpen();
SourceLocation LBraceLoc = T.getOpenLocation();
/// InitExprs - This is the actual list of expressions contained in the
/// initializer.
ExprVector InitExprs;
if (Tok.is(tok::r_brace)) {
// Empty initializers are a C++ feature and a GNU extension to C.
if (!getLangOpts().CPlusPlus)
Diag(LBraceLoc, diag::ext_gnu_empty_initializer);
// Match the '}'.
return Actions.ActOnInitList(LBraceLoc, None, ConsumeBrace());
}
// Enter an appropriate expression evaluation context for an initializer list.
EnterExpressionEvaluationContext EnterContext(
Actions, EnterExpressionEvaluationContext::InitList);
bool InitExprsOk = true;
while (1) {
// Handle Microsoft __if_exists/if_not_exists if necessary.
if (getLangOpts().MicrosoftExt && (Tok.is(tok::kw___if_exists) ||
Tok.is(tok::kw___if_not_exists))) {
if (ParseMicrosoftIfExistsBraceInitializer(InitExprs, InitExprsOk)) {
if (Tok.isNot(tok::comma)) break;
ConsumeToken();
}
if (Tok.is(tok::r_brace)) break;
continue;
}
// Parse: designation[opt] initializer
// If we know that this cannot be a designation, just parse the nested
// initializer directly.
ExprResult SubElt;
if (MayBeDesignationStart())
SubElt = ParseInitializerWithPotentialDesignator();
else
SubElt = ParseInitializer();
if (Tok.is(tok::ellipsis))
SubElt = Actions.ActOnPackExpansion(SubElt.get(), ConsumeToken());
SubElt = Actions.CorrectDelayedTyposInExpr(SubElt.get());
// If we couldn't parse the subelement, bail out.
if (SubElt.isUsable()) {
InitExprs.push_back(SubElt.get());
} else {
InitExprsOk = false;
// We have two ways to try to recover from this error: if the code looks
// grammatically ok (i.e. we have a comma coming up) try to continue
// parsing the rest of the initializer. This allows us to emit
// diagnostics for later elements that we find. If we don't see a comma,
// assume there is a parse error, and just skip to recover.
// FIXME: This comment doesn't sound right. If there is a r_brace
// immediately, it can't be an error, since there is no other way of
// leaving this loop except through this if.
if (Tok.isNot(tok::comma)) {
SkipUntil(tok::r_brace, StopBeforeMatch);
break;
}
}
// If we don't have a comma continued list, we're done.
if (Tok.isNot(tok::comma)) break;
// TODO: save comma locations if some client cares.
ConsumeToken();
// Handle trailing comma.
if (Tok.is(tok::r_brace)) break;
}
bool closed = !T.consumeClose();
if (InitExprsOk && closed)
return Actions.ActOnInitList(LBraceLoc, InitExprs,
T.getCloseLocation());
return ExprError(); // an error occurred.
}
// Return true if a comma (or closing brace) is necessary after the
// __if_exists/if_not_exists statement.
bool Parser::ParseMicrosoftIfExistsBraceInitializer(ExprVector &InitExprs,
bool &InitExprsOk) {
bool trailingComma = false;
IfExistsCondition Result;
if (ParseMicrosoftIfExistsCondition(Result))
return false;
BalancedDelimiterTracker Braces(*this, tok::l_brace);
if (Braces.consumeOpen()) {
Diag(Tok, diag::err_expected) << tok::l_brace;
return false;
}
switch (Result.Behavior) {
case IEB_Parse:
// Parse the declarations below.
break;
case IEB_Dependent:
Diag(Result.KeywordLoc, diag::warn_microsoft_dependent_exists)
<< Result.IsIfExists;
// Fall through to skip.
LLVM_FALLTHROUGH;
case IEB_Skip:
Braces.skipToEnd();
return false;
}
while (!isEofOrEom()) {
trailingComma = false;
// If we know that this cannot be a designation, just parse the nested
// initializer directly.
ExprResult SubElt;
if (MayBeDesignationStart())
SubElt = ParseInitializerWithPotentialDesignator();
else
SubElt = ParseInitializer();
if (Tok.is(tok::ellipsis))
SubElt = Actions.ActOnPackExpansion(SubElt.get(), ConsumeToken());
// If we couldn't parse the subelement, bail out.
if (!SubElt.isInvalid())
InitExprs.push_back(SubElt.get());
else
InitExprsOk = false;
if (Tok.is(tok::comma)) {
ConsumeToken();
trailingComma = true;
}
if (Tok.is(tok::r_brace))
break;
}
Braces.consumeClose();
return !trailingComma;
}
|